Rochester, NY is a dump
The next time you consider going to Rochester, consider this: Rochester has the same number of murders as Toronto despite having only a fraction of the population.
Page Thirty-One
02 NOVEMBER 2005
|
|||
Robach Calls For VLTs on Ferry
by Anthony Pascale Published Nov 02, 2005 As Rochester considers ways to ramp up fast ferry revenue, one New York lawmaker is reviving his call for gambling on the boat. State Senator Joe Robach says he'll reintroduce his bill for video lottery terminals either on the boat or in the ferry terminal. But not everyone agrees that VLTs would be a solution to the boat's problems. “I thought they needed it before. I certainly think they ought to take a look at it now and make this happen,” said Robach. Robach says he's talked to those close to the ferry project about reviving his VLT bill. He wants Rochester to benefit from legal gaming in NY. “If you want to have a tourist destination, I think you have to have the components that tourists like. Gaming is part of it,” he said. (Oh? Say Joe, where'd you say your Masters degree in Travel and Tourism is from?) While Robach successfully got a VLT bill passed in the senate in the past, Assembly Democrats failed to take action on it. Assemblyman Joe Morrelle supported the idea but he couldn't get others in Albany to join him. Morelle says that was because Rochester Mayor Bill Johnson's opposed VLTs. Morelle now questions whether the gaming machines would generate enough revenue to plug future ferry's deficits. “I would not want people to hold this out as a way to rescue this project,” he said. The mayor still opposes the idea. He also questions how much gaming could help. “I think that it sounds good but I don't think there's been an exhaustive study about the pros and cons of how much revenue the VLTs will produce and whether it's sufficient to take that risk.” Bay Ferries, which operates The CAT, has gambling on its ferry that serves Bar Harbor, Maine and Nova Scotia. The company has not called for gambling in the past, but company vice president Don Cormier told R News Wednesday: “We are considering all possibilities at this point in formulating our business plan for next year." Senator Robach won't be able to submit his bill until January, when the legislature goes back into session. (Oh, I get it now. By the time the political wheels get moving, THIS bill will be moot because the ferry will have long since been declared DOA. Senator Joe says, "Oh-well-I-tried-remember-this-at-election-time". Then again, maybe he truly believes the service is going to actually start up again in 2006. Either way, VLT's are a long stretch.) The city’s next mayor will likely have to deal with the VLT issue. (No they won't.) Republican John Parrinello has said from the start of his campaign that he would like to see VLTs on the ferry. Democrat Bob Duffy says he'd keep an open mind to any revenue stream. (Nice sidestepping, Bob.) Working Families Party member Tim Mains says he would want to better study the pro's and cons. |
These guys aren't giving me any break. The sheer blindness of some local political 'leaders' is staggering.
First, let's get one thing out in the open: State Senator Joseph E. Robach (D) is the son of the late State Assemblyman Roger J. Robach (D) who was in office from 1975 to 1991. Senator Joe filled the vacancy of the Assemblyman position when his father passed in 1991. In a day when who you know is more important than what you know, one needs to keep this tidbit in mind.
Senator Joe has a solid educational background and proven track record of his own, but let's not forget how he got started in State government. A 'leg up' is often seen as a black mark by some.
Anyway, Senator Joe needs to tone down the political rhetoric a few notches and listen to reason instead of reaction. Political life, such as it is, often casts a dense fog over The Real World and I suspect this may be one of those times.
Joe, my oblivious friend, the primary and fundamental purpose of any transportation vehicle is to carry passengers from Point A to Point B. It is a means to an end, not the end itself which is what Rochester ferry supporters are trying desperately to emphasize. It is, after all, only a boat which shuttles passengers back and forth across the lake. It's NOT the Pacific Princess. It's NOT the QEII. It isn't even a Windjammer cruise. It's a diesel powered, utilitarian barge with nice carpeting and some lovely decorating features which carries filthy cars in its belly and a nasty tub ring at its waterline. Let's not make this thing out to be the Grand Dame of the Cruise World. It's not.
Canadian passengers are on board for less than three hours... barely enough time to catch a good beer buzz or engage in an intense session of Blackjack. They are NOT on board for the glories of stashing cash into a VLT. There are PLENTY of places for them to do that at home without forking over an 'entrance fee' of a passenger fare. The presence of VLT's will have such a negligible effect on ferry passenger numbers as to render the machines useless.
Ontario has said "No" to gambling on board and that means cross the dotted line into Canada on the lake and the VLT's are switched off. How much time would that give to VLT players? You little New York legislators think you're so clever, just what would you do if Ontario said, "Oh, VLT's on board? No problem. Look for another port to sail to on the American side because you're no longer welcomed at Ontario ports.. whether the things are turned on or off."
THEN what are you sports going to do? I can hear the gunshot to the foot already. Smart move, huh?
Ontario wouldn't do it? Heh-heh-heh!! Why wouldn't they? Why shouldn't they? Why wouldn't they do their damnedest to keep Ontario gambling dollars in Ontario instead of shipping them across the lake? They might not be able to stop a casino in downtown Rochester, but they sure as hell can stop A N Y ship from entering Canadian waters for even the weakest of reasons. And given THIS ship has pretty much been nothing but a royal pain in the ass to the Canadian interests since Day One, it doesn't take too much imagination to see it would be child's play to slam the Port of Toronto shut to Ye Olde Ferry - or A N Y Canadian port for that matter.
Oh my. Oh my-Oh my-Oh my. 'We' Americans forgot that Canada is a sovereign country, didn't 'we'?
"Well, YES... yes... Ontario COULD do that, but think of the tourist dollars they'd be losing."
Not nearly as much as the U.S. side stands to lose. YOU guys are the ones with the huge loan, huge debt, money-sucking ferry and tanking economy. Toronto rakes in billions a year as an international destination. Can Rochester say the same?
Great scenario, huh? A fast ferry with a home port and no place to go. THAT ought to REALLY spark the passenger revenue, no?
{Worry. Angst. Sweat. Heartburn.}
SOOOO, Senator Joe. Just let's see you put that SWELL tourism acumen of yours to work and go back to your drawing board and come up with some other dog 'n pony show, cause THIS one ain't gonna see the light of day.
And if it DOES, don't say you weren't warned.
I think Ontario Premier McGuinty is with me on THIS one. You Americans want to put it to the test?
Previous ferry owners (we assume that would be CATS) said VLT's 'could' (as in, 'might') generate 'up to' $1 million a year? Well, that's good enough for ramming through VLT legislation, isn't it?
Of course, CATS also claimed wild estimates of passenger numbers, exaggerated profit margins, underestimated operational costs and generally had difficulty distinguishing fact from fantasy. It's a mystery why WROC-TV would even bother dredging up the $1 million figure and extremely unsettling to consider anybody would even think it had any relevance.
"Regardless of the report, but I think even now more so, the name of the game is capturing every tourist dollar we can, making that an attractive tourist destination, creating every job we can. I certainly think gaming is part of tourism today and we should seize that opportunity," said Robach.
Waitaminute. 'Gaming is a part of tourism today'? I wasn't aware of Casino Disney in Orlando. Cleveland does a great job keeping the VLT's low-keyed at the Rock and Rock Hall of Fame. The Baccarat rooms at Algonquin Park are well disguised in the cabins. Who would have guessed the Mall of America in Bloomington MN harboured Roulette wheels just around the food court? The Six Flags conglomerate just wouldn't be the same without High Stakes Poker. Those heritage sites would be nothing if it weren't for the slots. Try to imagine Eco-Tourism without Gai Pow Poker or National Parks without Crap tables. The Tunnels of Moose Jaw in Saskatchewan would have been dreary indeed minus Texas Hold'em. 'Gaming is a part of tourism today'?
No, to unimaginative.. and desperate... organizers who can only mimic what the next town down the road is doing, gaming would appear to be the Great Panacea for energizing a moribund project and local economy. You know the types: one size fits all, it worked there so it HAS to work here, gross generalizations carry more weight than unique solutions, scratching for every last dollar in no way cheapens a regional project, maintaining an air of sophistication is for losers... those types.
And let's not forget to ignore the input of the party of the second part. You know, the piddlin' customers, the Canadians. We just want their money... but as for respecting their right to assert their OWN agenda and laws... well, we're so used to getting our own way it's just a given we don't need to bother to ask if they'd mind if we stocked the boat with VLT's.
As a Canadian, I find it very strange the American interests are simply assuming the Canadian ports on Lake Ontario are theirs to pull in as they see fit. As written previously, all it would take is the provincial or municipal government to say, "Know what? We've had enough of this. Go find some other dock on your own side of the lake to tie up at... we're outta this scene" and the ferry business would implode faster than the CATS closure. THEN what? That sort of power should be fairly intimidating or at least sobering enough to slap some humility in the Ferry Corporation and the politicos who are trying to save it.
The ultimate 'Who Needs Who More?' - or - 'Who REALLY holds the trump cards?'
Hmmm. It would appear the Upper Hand calls Canada 'home'. That's a very comforting thought... although it might be somewhat unsettling to the Southern contingent.
Enjoy.
Oh, and for those still holding onto Eastman Kodak stock with high hopes the dinosaur will spark to life with digital brilliance, here's yet MORE good news for the local economy:
|
Not a pretty picture.
Any wonder why the ferry is getting so much attention?
03 NOVEMBER 2005
|
Well, THIS one's not going to make the Flower City brochure, that's for sure. JEEZ... at least Richard could have forgotten about the physical assault aspect and focused more on the ferry experience.
Didn't you enjoy the ferry ride over, Richard? Wasn't the ride nice and smooth? And how 'bout those on-board shops? Pretty nifty, eh? Didja get to see Rochester's Upper Falls? Didja?? Didja??
Perfect, Richard. Absolutely, profoundly spot-on, we-need-this-sort-of-honesty critique. Possibly without intention, it speaks volumes in a few mere paragraphs.
Local ferry supporters are so damn preoccupied with some boat ride, they completely ignore the home port urban destination which has slid into, as my Canadian friend has described, 'a rancid hell-hole'. High praise, indeed. Just the sort of buzz which propels those Toronto residents and Canadian tourists down to Cherry Street to anxiously - literally - glide on down to Charlotte.
Robach wants VLT's. Schumer and Clinton are fussing about passports. Johnson and Douglas are busy filling out loan applications. Bay Ferries and CATS are vexing about the lack of tschotchke shops in the terminal. Locals are waxing poetic about on-deck breezes in their hair.
And Toronto tourists are getting pasted in the jaw in downtown Rochester 'just because'. Rochester's Finest respond with sympathy and compassion by sitting on their fat asses filling out a report.
Misplaced priorities? Well, of course they are and the passenger numbers reflect this.
"Let's take out a half-page... no..no.. a FULL-PAGE.. ad in the Ottawa Citizen! That way, Gord and Linda in Vanier can't help but be enticed to visit Rochester on the ferry! Brilliant!! Brilliant!! Double-latté, anyone?"
Parrinello wants Keno-In-Sibley-Tower, Mains wants a Sub Compact Ferry, Duffy wants to hide and Maj wants to mellow out. Meanwhile, the city of Rochester wants to build the niftiest bus stop this side of San Diego and the suburbs would absolutely love to build a tall wall on the city limits to compete with the Chinese version.
Kodak just wants to bulldoze buildings to reduce the tax bill and any potential EPA cleanup fines.
Hey Richard? Rochester NY isn't just ANY dump. It's a quintessentially dysfunctional dump. When the number of violent crimes in New York State's THIRD largest metro are keeps pace with Canada's LARGEST metro area just across the lake, that's a sad indictment of a community in chaos. The Rochester locals are quaintly Hometown Proud even as the quality of life slips precipitously toward that of South Central LA, yet critical views are met with condemnation and indignation. To them, constructive criticism is no more helpful than destructive criticism and they blithely forge ahead with blind ignorance. 'If we ignore it, maybe it'll go away'.
Fire the engines, boys. Let's head over and try to convince the folks in Hogtown and Bytown that Roch-cha-cha is a tourist mecca worth spending a pretty penny to ride the waves. When they get here they might be underwhelmed, but by that time the cash is in the account. That's what it's all about after all.
Pathetic. And Richard, I apologize for the World Class Ugliness. The Canadians in this area are just as shocked at conditions as you and your friend unfortunately experienced.
It may be superfluous, but my recommendation would be: Don't bother coming back. Not much will have changed.
Paying a visit to the Why-Bother-Advertising Department:
From Watertown, New York
|
||||||
From Albany, New York
|
Senators: Passport rule could slow ferry business (Washington - AP) — New York's senators are warning the new passport requirement for northern border crossings could hurt business on the fast ferry that runs between Rochester and Toronto. Senators Charles Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton met separately with Canadian ambassador Frank McKenna today to discuss their concerns. Passports would be required in 2007. Schumer said business on the newly reopened ferry could be hurt if homeland security officials decide it falls under the category of a sea crossing. The ferry lost 4.2 million dollars in its first two months back. Clinton said she was worried about the effect on tourism. Elected officials on both sides of the border are asking for an easy, less expensive alternative to passports. A US passport now costs about 100 dollars. |
See, Bill? You don't have to blow more money by running to yet another slimy marketing consultant firm. Word of the ferry has spread far and wide... the North Country and Capital District already KNOW of the ferry. That won't do anything to entice them to c'mon over and chow down on a white hot - as the passenger figures show - but there's no need to pay arrogant and pretentious advertising hacks more bucks for professional insipid crap.
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Ecological issues pursue fast ferry
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| the local rag and the typical liberal djs and pundints have put our money where there big mouths are and have endoresed public tax dollars for the life of the ferry in order to keep it running. |