Page Sixty-Six

19 JANUARY 2006

"I was just too busy..."

 

 

34º | Hi 44º / Lo 34º |
 
Calendar rushed ferry panel

(January 19, 2006) — City Council last January named me one of two private-sector members on the board of managers of the Rochester Ferry Co. LLC. I saw this as a chance to promote our festivals, sports events, universities, wineries, industries, hotels, convention center, etc. I am sad for us all that financial realities forced us to discontinue ferry operations.

I want to indicate my perceptions of the constraints under which the ferry board operated and to clarify and correct any statements I have made.

After the ferry purchase last February, the Johnson administration, staff and ferry board faced several immediate challenges. Contracts from the former CATS organization had been in place, about which the outside managers, such as I, had no knowledge, as we were not part of the efforts until after the bankruptcy. Contracts needed to be amended, curtailed or executed by the new organization and we needed to execute new pacts with new organizations.

It was already late February and the ferry needed to start up no later than spring. Bay Ferries had been identified as the most qualified management company (a decision I supported). As there were no corporation staff, city staff negotiated contracts on the board's behalf. To them we were grateful.

The negotiated contracts came before the board, sometimes verbally, often with little time for detailed review. We often discussed contract changes. Sometimes, time simply did not allow new negotiations.  (Can't handle the work?  Don't take the job.)

Meanwhile, we faced insurance, warranty, pilotage, boat repair, marketing and other issues. Fuel costs grew sharply, affecting all operating analyses. Marketing expectations were within the management contract, at a minimal budget, a fact that later became an issue.

Given the mounting budget concerns, we formed three committees, one, the Finance Committee that I chaired, with the able help of city finance staff.

While we discussed an increase in borrowing, we also identified items that we felt needed to be part of the ongoing board's responsibilities. These included negotiating a reduction of the expense associated with the Toronto Port Authority pact that I understood to be $250,000 for 2006. While I did not recall the 14-year term of the contract covered in the conference call, the minutes indicate this was part of the discussion. I regret this mistake. (A costly oversight, wouldn't you say?)

We also identified other financial impact issues. These included operating under the U.S. flag (pilotage), developing a broader marketing program and funds to support it, resolving the Rochester port issues, developing other revenue (public and private), in order to close the revenue/expense gap.

Mayor Johnson's and the City Council's staffs worked hard within the constraints and critical periods facing us. In the final analysis, there were just too many hurdles to overcome. We need to move forward, now, without acrimony. Mayor Robert Duffy's decision is moving forward, and as a board member, I support his decision.

Noble Hanson is secretary, board of managers of the Rochester Ferry Co. LLC.

"These included operating under the U.S. flag (pilotage), developing a broader marketing program and funds to support it, resolving the Rochester port issues, developing other revenue (public and private), in order to close the revenue/expense gap."

Conspicuously absent is the completely UNHEARD OF thought that maybe the expected revenue estimates held as much credibility as Squeaky Froome.  Holding the line on unrealistic passenger revenue numbers in a attempt to close a bottom line gap is nothing but an accounting shell game.  It came back to bite the Ferry Board on the butt.

"We need to move forward, now, without acrimony."

Translation: "Let's just forget about it.  No use crying over spilt milk.  Water under the bridge.  Can't change the past.  Forgive and forget.  Get over it and move on."

Sorry.  No can do.  Accountability in government requires assigning credit where credit's due and blame where blame's due.  If that comes across as acrimonious, mean-spirited or just plain nasty... "If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen".  With the Golden Ring of Leader-gag-ship beckoning, many people are finding the dizzying heights of personal and/or career achievements come with some very unpleasant perks... screwing up becomes subject to intense scrutiny under a microscope.

Don't like it?  Don't apply for the job.

Fast Ferry for sale, interested buyers

1/18/06

Questions loom about who may be interested in purchasing Rochester’s fast ferry. Last week, Mayor Bob Duffy announced the city would stop service and sell the ship. Duffy says he has received numerous phone calls from interested buyers; including the Turkish government. Duffy also says a prominent former Rochester resident has expressed interest in the ferry route.

Mayor Duffy has put three city hall employees in charge of selling the ship. They include City Attorney Tom Richards, Budget Director Bill Ansbrow and Finance Director Vince Carfagna. Industry experts believe the ferry will sell for around $15 - $18 million.

Meanwhile, City Council members have approved a more than $9 million plan to pay off Rochester’s fast ferry debt. Duffy says the city will repay the $2.5 million it owes Bay Ferries. The Rochester Ferry Company also had a contract with The Toronto Port Authority agreeing to pay them $250,000 a year for 14 years.

"Industry experts believe the ferry will sell for around $15 - $18 million. "

"Duffy has said the city should expect no less than $20 million for the ship it bought for $32 million last February."

Democrat & Chronicle - January 17, 2006

Up to a 25% discrepancy in the projected sale price of the ferry?  And exactly 'WHO' are these so-called 'industry experts'?

Are Rochesterians immediately humbled by words like 'expert', 'professional', consultant' or the ever-popular 'leader' without further questioning?  Are superficial titles supposed to take the place of proven practical results and expertise?

The World's Image Capital, indeed.

The London Free PressOntario ferry flop won't sink Erie bid
 

Fri, January 20, 2006

By CP

CLEVELAND -- Promoters of a Lake Erie ferry service between Cleveland and Port Stanley are undeterred by the failure of a Lake Ontario ferry between Rochester, N.Y., and Toronto.

Rochester's new mayor, Robert Duffy, rejected a $11.5-million US loan request to bankroll the Lake Ontario ferry service this year.

Rochester's decision to halt its ferry service won't affect Cleveland, said Rose Ann DeLeon of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, which is pushing the local effort to start a Lake Erie service by next year.

The uncertain future of the harbour at Port Stanley has contributed to delays. The municipality is trying to buy the property from the Canadian government.

Ownership must be settled before Royal Wagenborg, the Dutch company negotiating to operate the service, signs a contract.

Unlike Rochester, Cleveland's ferry would carry commercial traffic as well as passengers.

A proposal for a Lake Erie ferry between Port Burwell and a port northeast of Cleveland also is being held up by talks in Canada, said Mayor Chris Conley of Grand River, Ohio.

Just for reference: The blue line is the proposed Cleveland-Port Stanley route; the highlighted red dot is Port Burwell.

As is plainly obvious, the proposed cross-Erie route has some merit... although depending on the origin/destination of the commercial traffic, it may be somewhat limited.  Canadian snowbirds from Southern Ontario might find the shortcut appealing and with the explosion of development and unchecked economic growth in London and along the 401 corridor to Toronto, trucking companies might find the service useful.

I-77 starts in Cleveland and ends in Columbia SC... a direct route to the sun and fun for those Canadians wishing to avoid the winter routine.  THIS ferry might stand a far better chance of surviving than the Toronto-Rochester route could have ever hoped to achieve.  The drive time savings alone makes it more attractive as the Ambassador Bridge can be as bogged down as the Buffalo-Niagara bridges.

But again, since I'm familiar with both Port Stanley and Port Burwell, I have to admit I'm fairly reluctant to see such a commercial undertaking wreck the character of these two hidden beauties.  I don't live there though, and the residents may welcome the influx of cash.

"The uncertain future of the harbour at Port Stanley has contributed to delays. The municipality is trying to buy the property from the Canadian government.  Ownership must be settled before Royal Wagenborg, the Dutch company negotiating to operate the service, signs a contract."

I'm a bit leery about this aspect as well.  Only guessing here: I suspect the waterfront/docking facilities are owned and managed by Ports Canada or some such branch of the Federal government and Port Stanley may have to actually own the facility -- so Royal Wagenborg has a 'little guy' to sue in the event of a disagreement.  Taking on the Canadian government in court on their own soil could present a real problem for a Dutch-based company -- whereas a small town could be blown out of the water in the courts by a multinational with formidable cash and a team of lawyers on its side.   It's called leverage.  Just guessing, though.

The ferry route might work if that's what BOTH Cleveland AND Port Stanley want.  In the case of the Toronto-Rochester route, only one side really wanted (needed?) the ferry and it sure wasn't Toronto.

Toronto sort of played along with the charade... somewhat unenthusiastically and grudgingly... and when it was all over politely asked, "Is the game over so soon?"

Yup.  Despite 14-year lease agreements, it's not worth playing the game if your partner has no interest.

Businesses, like some marriages, are like that sometimes.  Time to file for a separation and put an end to the charade.


Harper has offered you a Conservative platform that adds up to over $75 billion in promises that would drive Canada into deficit.

Running a deficit will clearly force Harper to cut government programs.
He has already confirmed that he would raise taxes on middle and low-income Canadians, and withdraw from the Kyoto accord as well as from the Kelowna agreement with First Nations and First Ministers.

Stephen Harper is no friend of the First Nations and admitted on Thursday's segment of the CBC's The National that First Nations issues aren't among his top five priorities.  Sort of begs the question:  Just where ARE First Nations issues on the Tories' agenda?

Haldimand-Norfolk

Bob Speller

 www.bobspeller.com

Brant

Lloyd St. Amand

 www.lloydstamand.ca


 To next page