Page
Seventy-Three
Rule Britannia.
|
|
|
|
|
British firm may buy ferry
Foreign media suggest it would be used
for crossings to France
(March 18, 2006) —
A newly formed company in England reportedly is negotiating to buy
Rochester's high-speed ferry for service on the English Channel. Rochester spokesman and ferry board member Gary Walker said, however, that the city is not in final discussions with any company, and he left the validity of Navmed's claim in doubt.
"We've got movement. We've got interest. We've got serious talks with persons interested in the ferry," Walker said. "But we've got no done deal yet. ... We haven't entered into the end-game negotiations." Mayor Robert Duffy decided Jan. 10 to end the Rochester-to-Toronto service and sell the ship after the operation lost $10 million in 10 months. The city-run Rochester Ferry Co. was broke and manager Bay Ferries Great Lakes LLC covered $3.2 million in expenses. Debt from the ferry venture exceeds $40 million, including the expense of buying the ship. The vessel remains docked at the Port of Rochester. Navmed and its financial backers plan to invest more than $52 million (U.S.) in a plan that includes two other high-speed ferries crossing between Dover and Calais, France, and possibly other ports, the media reports said. The previous Dover-to-Calais service shut down in November, citing financial losses. The Dover-to-Boulogne route would duplicate a service in operation since May 2004, according to the respective company Web sites. Navmed, also called Navmed-Highspeedferries and based in Folkestone, England, did not respond to an e-mail Friday. (One can only wonder, 'Why not?') Attempts to locate a telephone number were unsuccessful. Tom Richards, Rochester's corporation
counsel, has said that he would not discuss details until a ferry deal is
final. Should the ship be sold to a location outside the Great Lakes, it would be taken out through the St. Lawrence Seaway, which opens for the season Thursday. Seaway officials said the city has not contacted them about moving the ferry. (That would tend to indicate there may be no destination to move it to, no? As in, nobody's interested?) Walker said the city has no specific
timetable for the ferry. (Well, OK.
But the payments are still due.) |
Oh. You guys talkin' about this?
|
|
Saturday, March 18, 2006 |
|
Brits to Rochester: "Thank you, no. Go peddle your boat elsewhere."
Oh my. As of this Thursday, the Seaway is open and the Rochester ferry can sail out of the Great Lakes at anytime to the new owner's dock located at ____ ? I mean, what's the point of hanging on to a ship that has no future in the Great Lakes? The financially prudent thing to do would be to get rid of it as soon as possible to cut the losses.
Up to now, the Seaway has been closed and even if the celebrated barge WAS sold, it couldn't go anywhere. But now that the Seaway escape route is opening, the only thing that's keeping it from becoming a memory is a ready and willing new buyer. The payments just keep on coming due and there's the issue of maintenance and support staff which keeps the meter running as well. Getting rid of it is critical to saving money... as even if a great selling price were realized, the overhead of paying for a ship sitting still will offset any cheerful news of a generous winning offer.
But then, the financial geniuses and community 'leaders' of Rochester know all this, right?
Ex-Mayor Bill Johnson can only be blamed for so long, then the culpability shifts to those who're sitting on their thumbs and not aggressively trying to unload this Flower City embarrassment.
Sell the damn thing already. You guys made this stinking mess, now clean it up.
Useless twits....
Something strange is going on.
|
||
|
|
|
Throwing away silver to look for gold, are we?
OK. Might as well get the best buck for the barge.. that way, we can brag how much money we recouped from the debacle even though the amount of money from a really great bid is offset by the additional cost of keeping the boat on the city's list of assets and is increasing with each passing day.
But, in the world of politics, the braindead taxpayers will only be paying attention to the final sale price and not the amount of cash that's being spent until then.
Just business as usual in a community more concerned with superficial fluff instead of pragmatic substance. Proof positive that they really CAN'T tell it from shinola.
On my usual forays to the Great White North, the folks have been slipping comments about the ferry into conversation once they learn I live in the Rochester area. More snickering than sympathetic, the Canadians have been wasting no amount of glee to take potshots at American follies and I've been hearing two primary themes: Bush and the ferry... in that order.
Fair enough. When a country keeps hearing of the infallibility of the southern neighbours, it's sort of nice to point out the repeated flops which prove otherwise. The Lake Ontario basin residents are all too familiar with the ferry idiocy based in the Image Capital and the northern contingent won't soon forget the hoopla which amounted to nothing.
And Bush's demagoguery is cause for alarm in the north... as it is around the world. But 'we're Americans and we don't care what others think about us anyway'. I digress.
"Shikara formed in April 2005 and gets its money from Middle Eastern investors, Airs said."
Oh. Is that supposed to be relevant? Has the scourge and paranoia of the Middle East reached to the shores of Lake Ontario yet? Must be.
Or maybe it's just the D&C appealing to the American public's hatred of All Things Within 2000 Miles of Iraq. It worked for Dubai, so it'll work for some civilian boat rusting in an obscure port in a place the majority of the world never heard of and has even less interest in.
It's getting so I don't dare turn up the volume on Tarkan's Bounce for fear of the neighbours running to call the folks at Homeland Security. Those Turkish dance DJ's spin tunes which sound too much like Islamic call for prayers, doncha know? Must mean that Native dude is up to no good.
Americans not only invented hypercriticism, they've cornered the market on wholesale paranoia as well.
A lesson on rust in the local environment.
Ever notice how car and truck bodies seem to rot faster in the spring than the winter? As temperatures rise and the saline solution of salted slush begins to seep in every crevice, metal is bathed in the corrosive crap and ferrous oxide takes hold. That's rust.
Some metals stand up better than others; aluminum and stainless steel are a little more durable but one is hard pressed to find cars and trucks made of the stuff. Audi's have aluminum body parts for that reason.
The ferry is weathering away at the Port of Rochester... as it's been sitting exposed to the local elements since the plug was pulled from the operation. I'm not about to pretentiously assume I'm any sort of a ship builder, but I have to believe NO vessel is able to be tied-up indefinitely without starting to show signs of decay. No, the ship probably isn't going to sink next week from massive hull rusting, but neither is it going to be in any better shape.
If the ship had been stored in a VERY big boathouse, it wouldn't age as quickly as it already has. Make sense? But considering the size of such a boathouse would engulf the majority of the Port of Rochester, that wasn't a possibility. Neither was the city able to drop on down to AutoZone and pick up the ferry equivalent of a car cover. So the ship rusts and last year's new paint job is beginning to look like Merle's '84 GMC and that doesn't warm the cockles of prospective buyers.
City of Rochester? Go ahead and fuss about whether those A-rabs might have investments in a potential buyer of the ferry. If that's more important than saving money to be able to provide funding for education, housing and safety, then your priorities might need a closer examination.
But then, we knew that already.
Why rush now? It's only money.
|
||
|
|
|
"Better a snubbed feeling or two among bidders than a snookered feeling in Rochester, having sold the ship to a business that can't make its payments."
That is, assuming the city holds the mortgage on the ship once it's sold. Which would be about as idiotic as the city buying the ship in the first place... which means that's probably what the city is willing to do.
How stupid is that? Pretty damn foolish and it solves nothing; one would think that after the city came close to defaulting on its loan to EFIC, it would realize that prospective borrowers/operators of such a highly risky and speculative business would stand a better-than-average chance of defaulting on the loan. Which, of course, leaves the holder of the mortgage holding the bag. Why in the name of all that's reasonable would the city of Rochester place itself in such a position?
What would Toronto do? Naturally I'm biased, but it seems to me that any metropolitan area which is bursting at the seams with growth and development -- and is consistently named as one of the world's most desirable and livable cities -- wouldn't attain such a position by making foolish business decisions. Holding onto the mortgage of a ship which has yet to turn a profit since it first hit the water is a recipe for further financial disaster.
My guess is Toronto would sell the ship to the first buyer with a decent offer who could get the financial backing from a bank. That way, the bank assumes the risk of a default and not the city. It's called Risk Management, but evidently the Rochester City Council has yet to hear of such a premise... they approved the buying of a failed business which resulted in the loss of $10 million in ten months, didn't they?
And once again, the city of Rochester 'leaders' are playing fast and loose with public monies by keeping the facts of the sale under wraps... then springing the details very much after the fact once a deal has been reached. Sound familiar?
A few questions. Just how disassociated are the local residents from their own government? How stupid do they see themselves and how stupid are their elected officials telling them they are?
Power to the people. It's far past time locals grabbed their political hacks by the necks and gave them a good bitch slap upside the head. When are Rochester area residents going to take back control of their own community? Local citizens groups waddle into meetings with homemade hand-scrawled placards whining about anything and everything, but as far as bringing in lawyers to threaten legal action to force the community 'leaders' to toe the line, they wimp out. Too reactionary. Too radical.
Nothing like the threat of termination to get the employees to follow orders. It works on the Average Jane and Joe... and it'll work on those who see themselves as 'above average' as well.