Page
Eleven
29
OCTOBER 2004
A rather ironic article
title and photo...
![[News]](titler_News.gif) |
Thursday
October 28, 2004 |
 |
|
![[Ferry Terminal: Full To Capacity]](calif10_26_04.jpg) |
|
Port's newest restaurant opens. |
Ferry Terminal: Full To
Capacity
by Rocco Vertuccio and Lisa Carino
Photo by Kyle Johnson
Published Oct 26, 2004
The final merchant to move into
the terminal building is ready to open.
California Rollin' will open its doors Friday. The Port of
Rochester location is the second for owner Tom Beaman. Beaman has spent
several months getting his sushi business ready.
Beaman says the ferry's problems have been frustrating for
terminal business owners, but he says operating a business at the port is
still a good opportunity.
"When I first took this spot I had to think what happens
if the ferry doesn’t get here, because at that time we weren't sure it was
going to get here. So I had made the decision it was going to be okay.
So while it's here and running in the winter, it will
be icing on the cake." (ed. Please
file this one under 'P' for Presumptuous.)
A coffee shop has also just opened, which will join the
existing sub shop, hamburger place, gift shop, and a new Abbotts.
California Rollin |
<<rolls eyes>>
A $16 million snack and souvenir shop??!!
Are you kidding me??!!
Only in Rochester would this be considered
'good for business'. 'Jobs', doncha know...
Let's take a closer look at the irony of the
accompanying photo above, shall we? I think that about says it all. All dressed up, table's set... and the
guests are no-shows.
There are a slew of blogs and forums out
there with scathing assessments of the Ferry service and how it's been handled.
Occasionally, there are tepid endorsements of CATS but those are few and far
between. The vox populi contradicts the media blurbs which report
upbeat optimism for an investor-fueled restart of the service... just in time
for the annual retreat to more indoor-based activities.
As for the 'full to capacity' ferry
terminal, I suppose it's not nice to double-over in laughter to read of some
community's key transportation facility 'packed' with four fast food stands and
a trinket shop. Yes.. yes.. I know, I know; Rochester New York isn't
in the same league as say, Miami Florida. "Our version of a cruise ship
can't compare with the QEII, but we're proud of it anyway." Yes.. that's
cute in a real 'hometown' kind of way. No -
really.. it's a nice feature of a smaller
community.
And I guess misplaced civic pride is civic
pride nonetheless. Rah, Rah, Rah-cha-cha.
Desperate Attempts At Attracting
Tourists - Part II
| |
Thursday, October 28, 2004 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Home > Opinion > Essays
|
|
| |
Renaming I-490 would link Erie Canal to community
(October 28, 2004) — On Oct.
26, 1825, New York state Gov. DeWitt Clinton, aboard the packet boat
Seneca Chief and with cannon booming from the shore, proclaimed the
opening of the Erie Canal. Traveling east from Buffalo to the Hudson River
and then south, he emptied a barrel of Lake Erie water into the harbor at
New York City for "the weddings of the waters," and launched an era of
unprecedented economic development in 19th- and early 20th-century New
York.
Once again we have an opportunity to use this unique
asset as we move forward in the 21st century. By
designating Interstate 490, the former route of the Erie Canal in greater
Rochester, the Erie Canal Expressway, we can draw attention to the hidden
treasures of our canal communities.
In the years between the canal's completion and the
Civil War, the flow of settlers and commercial traffic along the canal
turned new towns into "ports." Rochester became America's first inland
boomtown, and New York state became an economic powerhouse. Beyond that
important function, the canal created a new national identity. The social
and progressive ideas of the era — abolition and women's rights — spread
throughout the canal corridor, and the canal served as an important route
for slaves using the Underground Railroad to reach Canada. This unbroken
heritage and culture for the communities that lay the canal are recognized
and celebrated even today.
In the early 1900s, Theodore Roosevelt relocated this
waterway. I-490 now closely follows the original 1823 route and many
buildings, businesses and artifacts from the waterway's long history
remain.
Richardson's Canal House (1818) is the oldest original
Erie Canal inn. Schoen Place contains grain storage facilities. Brighton
was bustling with canal-side hotels and saloons. The popular Brighton
Restaurant on East Avenue was once a canalside hotel. The Erie Canal
aqueduct over the Genesee River in Rochester is a landmark. The remains of
an 1852 lock and a canal remnant, which is now Lake Riley, are at the
I-490 Culver Road exit.
Although the canal is no longer a commercial engine that
drives agricultural and industrial growth, today it is valued for
recreational use and tourism and as a highly visible element that
contributes to our quality of life.
The name would help brand
projects, such as the existing canal-era Spring House restaurant and new
Spring House Commons shopping plaza on Monroe Avenue, and
reinforce the canal's contemporary significance along I-490 and in places
like Pittsford, Fairport and Spencerport.
Our community would be at the
forefront of efforts to preserve and enhance the canal's legacy for New
York and the nation and would continue unlocking its recreational and
tourism potential.
An immediate result would be to educate and remind the
more than 100,000 daily travelers that they are on the original route of
the Erie Canal.
Canal festivals and important historic sites that
identify our region in the American experience can be reached from the
Erie Canal Expressway, and we will attract visitors to the present day
waterway and trail.
By designating I-490 the Erie
Canal Expressway from exit 27 near Bushnell's Basin in Perinton through
Pittsford, Brighton, and Rochester to exit 9 near Gates, we will promote
the waterway where it still exists, as well as its visible historical
impact in Monroe County.
We invite participation and support from all of Monroe
County's communities to join us in accomplishing this important endeavor
and commemorating, in a very special way, 179 years of our connection to
the historic Erie Canal.
Frankel is town of Brighton
supervisor. Also endorsing this effort are County Executive Maggie Brooks;
Rochester Mayor Bill Johnson; state Sen. Joe Robach; county legislators
Linda Goldstein, Bill Benet and Kevin Murray; town supervisors Jim Smith
of Perinton and Bill Carpenter of Pittsford; Fairport Mayor Clark King and
Pittsford Mayor Robert Corby; Greater Rochester Visitor Association
President Ed Hall and Landmark Society of Western New York Executive
Director Henry McCartney.
|
Yup.... that oughtta do it, all right.
Paying homage to a gutted and paved-over historical site is a fitting tribute
indeed.
Calling six smoggy lanes of asphalt the
'Erie Canal Expressway' instead of 'Interstate 490' will dramatically improve
tourism, quality of life, enhance history and heritage, educate commuters, draw
the canal closer to the hearts and minds of residents and give ample opportunity
for really KEEN signs and geraniums announcing the beginning and end of said
expressway.
All with just a name change.
Amazing!!
Just... amazing. Check out the list of
endorsers of the 'Erie Canal Expressway'... a veritable Who's Who of Local
Community Leaders - including the Greater Rochester Visitor Association
President Ed Hall (the tourism guy).
Considering this latest community
initiative, are there any questions on how a single boat was supposed to
stimulate tourism and ramp up the local economy??
I rest my case.
Webcrawling hit:
Orpheus
|
| posted on 14-10-2004 at 17:25 |
|
|
If Bush wins, canada will be
crowded! They need to bring back that Rochester-Toronto Ferry ASAP!!
Here is the funny part: Bush is planning to take over canada if re-selected!
Edited on, October 14, 2004, 5:29 PM GMT, by Orpheus. |
|
|
No need to worry about Canada, Orpheus.
Canada has high standards on who we allow into our country... and we don't need
an eleventh province.

31
OCTOBER 2004
Desperate Attempts At Attracting
Tourists - Part III
|
|
 |
|
|
October 31,
2004 7:11 PM |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
High Hopes For High Falls
Holly Maynard (Rochester,
NY) 10/30/04 - "Don’t lose hope for High
Falls" is the message from Rochester’s mayor today. There has been
speculation about whether the Cordish, the company hired to revamp the
district, is doing its job.
But Mayor Johnson blames the economy for the rough start and says the Cordish Company is still dedicated to the project.
“Their commitment to this project is undiminished. They’ll continue to
work with us to bring some successful ideas that they’ve incorporated in
other cities,” Johnson said.
A first glance shows why some say High Falls is struggling. But it’s
early on a Friday night, and business managers say that later on you’ll
find the exact opposite.
Joe Rittler, who comes four times a month, said, “It’s a lot of fun down
here...lot of people...good atmosphere...not a lot of crime or
anything.”
But Rittler wishes it were more like the energetic entertainment
district the city promoted it to be. Instead - you see the quiet spot
where Jillian’s used to be. The company that owned it closed this
location. You also see a host of other vacant buildings.
“It could be so much more than it is right now, they could obviously do
more - maybe bring some new chains in here - developing some of these
apartment buildings,” Rittler said.
So far Cordish has put just two businesses here McFadden’s and Tiki
Bob’s.
The mayor admits the first year working with Cordish Company has been
challenging, but he says it’s getting better.
When asked about rumors that the Cordish developer is slowly abandoning
the project, manager John Foley said, “No way. In fact - they were just
here today. They haven’t abandoned the area. They put $5,000 into the
street fest we had two months back."
Foley said he and other managers hope more businesses show up soon. “I
really do [have faith in High Falls,]’ Foley said, “I wouldn’t be
working here if I thought it was a hopeless job.”
Cordish recently finished an entertainment project in Louisville,
Kentucky.
Mayor Johnson says he plans to visit that site to see what else can be
done in Rochester.
Cordish has a five-year deal with the city and the mayor
advised patience, as the city is only in its second year of the High
Falls revitalization project. |
|
High Falls Entertainment District? Uh-huh. For
those unfamiliar with this city of Rochester initiative, the High Falls area is
a few small city blocks located next to the Genesee River gorge near downtown.
It's a historic section where millraces are still in place which powered the
grist mills in the 1800's... old stone buildings, rather dark as a former
warehouse district might be expected. Not exactly a pristine area, the
High Falls area was spiffed up a decade or so ago to (ostensibly ) become a hip
urban 'entertainment district'. Brew pubs, restaurants, bars and a
smattering of retail spots were supposed to draw 'em in like a free beer 'n
pizza shindig.
Once the novelty wore off, so did consumer participation.
The renovations were decent enough, the atmosphere was interesting, but the
Rochester community experience is oriented to the Commuter Creed. Regional
public transportation is one of extreme time inefficiency and limited to public
buses which have both a limited schedule and service area.
Feel like a great meal and a boozy night with a few
friends? Designated driver, bus or a pricy cab ride to anywhere are the
three options... unlike in Toronto where a hard night of partying won't
necessarily wind up being a morning in jail, stumbling along because the last
bus has made its run or a cab ride which will cost a few days' pay.
Jilian's was a corporate confection... you know.. playing
up the 'theme' of the renovated old urban building... where diners and patrons
would wile away the hours amid the hanging farm implements and antique signs.
Along with Julian's, a brew-pub, the Empire Brewing Company, was another High
Falls 'attraction' which bit the dust.
As is the current business fad, 'contracting out' is the
innovative solution Rochester has adapted (remember, this is a hotbed of the
traditional) and the Cordish corporation was the choice to take over where other
corporations have failed.
(you KNOW there's point here...)
Failed ferry... failed entertainment district. Might
there be a connection? There's probably more than just one.
What plays in Peoria, may not necessarily receive rave
reviews in Rochester, if you catch my drift. What may be a great idea in
one community might be a disaster in another; the One-Solution-Fits-All-Problems
frame of mind is risky at best. It's a fairly
unoriginal path to take... doesn't require much deep introspection or
analysis... and is eminently sealed in 'risk management' (AKA Pass The Buck).
Who wants to stick their career on the line by venturing off in unproven
territory? Safe. Simple.
Idiotic. And sure to disappoint as seeking innovative
concepts involves higher risks but greater success. Know thyself. Be
real to yourself. And the Rochester community does neither.
That's a definite problem this community needs to address
before running out chasing identities of other communities. For example,
is the Rochester-Monroe County are a top tourist destination? No. It
never has been and forced attempts at creating a 'destination' have failed on
spectacular levels with obnoxious amounts of money being spent on propping up
the ill-fated efforts. High Falls is one... and the ferry debacle is
another.
What will it take to turn Rochester around? Well,
it's already too late for a radical shift of popular political and social dogma
so that leaves learning from hitting rock bottom... crisis management often
creates intensely creative solutions out of no other choice. Shouldn't
have to be that way, but there you have it.
02
NOVEMBER 2004
What next??
![[News]](titler_News.gif) |
Tuesday
November 02, 2004 |
|
Progress On Renaissance Square
by Seth Voorhees
Published Nov 01, 2004
There
are signs of progress on a quarter-billion dollar economic development
project expected to pump life into downtown Rochester.
(ed. 'Expected'? Not ANOTHER Crap
shoot...)
City and county leaders say they're taking proposals from
architects and engineering firms interested in the Renaissance Square
project.
Renaissance Square will combine a transit center, a new
downtown campus for Monroe Community College, and a performing arts center.
“This initial phase is clearly the phase where we will be
able to go out and talk to different groups, have public hearings, gather
input from all the different stakeholders and people who live in the
community,” said Maggie Brooks, Monroe County executive. “That's the
important focus of where we are now."
Renaissance Square is expected to
cost $250 million dollars. Leaders say they've secured $100 million of that.
(ed. AND...? Where's the other $150
million coming from?) The project is expected to take 5 to
6 years to complete. |
Oh. Did 'we' neglect to mention NYS Governor George
Pataki vetoed an $18 million state 'donation' to this project? What's that
say about State support of this project?
Oh and... uhh... did 'we' also forget to mention
'we' have no idea where the rest of the money is coming to finish the project...
a project 'we're' going to start nonetheless and do a Super Special Hopeful
Dance to raise the balance?
Let's make an analogy. You're going to build a nice
home... not just a basic house, but one which will have some fairly nice
amenities. The final tab is going to be $250,000 and the bank says
OK to $100,000... the rest is up to you to dig up somehow. Do you (A) wait
to begin building until you know you have the full $250,000 funding or (B) start
building and hope the rest of the $150,000 will somehow creep out of the
woodwork so you can finish the job?
That's the mindset of local 'leaders'; 'we' (the
'leaders') WANT a slick downtown bus terminal and come hell or high water,
'we're' going to build it.
'We' (again, the local 'leaders') WANT another undomed
sports venue and come hell or high water, 'we're' going to build it.
'We' (the clueless 'leaders') WANT a trendy gentrified
warehouse district and come hell or high water, 'we're' going to have one.
'We' ('who else?') WANT a slick fast ferry to Toronto, and
come hell or high water, 'we're' going to have one.
It just goes on and on and on and on... year after
year. One would think (or at least hope) by now the residents of this
community would be telling these 'leaders' to shut up and sit down... and keep
their minds on the 'need to have' instead of going for the 'nice to have'.
Like school funding, infrastructure maintenance and the flight of jobs and
people from this area. Local pols and the media dance a jig when a
piddling 100-$8/hr jobs are created.
Meanwhile, the other 6,900 workers just laid off are
wondering how they're going to make the mortgage payment on an $8/hr job or no
job at all. Tell me 5,000 new jobs are opening up and maybe
I'll get excited. Otherwise, don't make me sick.
The ferry debacle is only one symptom of a very serious
underlying cause. With this latest in a string of dead-end projects where
the bottom line is invariably red ink, it comes as no surprise CATS figures
redemption only requires restarting the engines. They're wrong of course,
but they'll find that out soon enough.
And so will their investors.
04
NOVEMBER 2004
What IS this??? Some sort of
CRAZE or something???
![[Business]](titler_Business.gif) |
Thursday
November 04, 2004 |
|
![[Hovercraft May Come to Lake Ontario]](hovercraft11_2_04.jpg) |
|
The "Spirit" may have to share the lake. |
Hovercraft May Come to
Lake Ontario
by Amy Young and Lisa Carino
File Photo
Published Nov 02, 2004
While the fate of Rochester's
fast ferry has yet to be determined, talk of another vessel on Lake Ontario
is surfacing. A Canadian startup company called Hover Transit Services based
in Bolton, Ontario has its radar on Rochester.
Dale Wilson of Hover Transit Services confirmed, "We plan
to go to the US as one of our potential target markets. Rochester, with the
great infrastructure that they put into place for the fast ferry, is an
excellent example of what can be done to increase international trade
between our two countries."
Hover Transit Services would initially serve Toronto,
Hamilton and St. Catherines
(sic). The ship would be capable of
floating above water and traveling on land. It would carry about 450 people
and 55 vehicles. Like the Spirit of Ontario, the Canadian ship's main
obstacle is money. At present, it’s been able to secure about 35% of the $7
million it needs to start up service by next July.
|
Well, this one isn't quite
as ludicrous, but it's still up there as being a real bomb of a business.
Lemme ask you people something: Am I the only one who
doesn't think driving the QEW from St.Catharines
to Toronto is a big deal? Good Grief.... from west of the 406 in St.Catharines
all the way to the Yonge-Bay exit on the Gardiner, it's three lanes wide in each
direction. Through the entire Niagara section, it's flat and straight with
extra wide shoulders to Brant Street in Burlington. Traffic gets
heavier from the 403/QEW merge for the rest of the way into Toronto, but that's
obviously to be expected considering drivers and passengers are entering one of
the largest metropolitan areas in North America.
I mean... DUH. As
if driving into Manhattan is any easier. Or Boston. Or
Baltimore-Washington D.C. Or any other large city. To be honest,
driving to and from Toronto is a pretty easy commute, comparatively speaking,
and it's not as if the NYS Thruway traffic is plodding along at any 65 mph
either... try 75-80 mph... same as on the QEW only with
two narrower lanes and a helluva lot more broken and patched
pavement.
So we're back to the same time/money thing. Take a
hovercraft from T.O. to St.Kitts? Like THAT'S going to save any time
considering the boarding and disembarking of vehicles. It's less than 60
minutes from the border to downtown T.O. and with the preliminary details
combined with transit time across the lake, then disembarking... it'll be a wash
and a more expensive one at that.
Same lake with the same ice floes which are small icebergs
that The Breeze has to contend with. Same winter weather with swells which
can reach six to eight feet with a typical windy day.
As for Rochester being a ripe target simply because it has
a ferry terminal collecting cobwebs and fast food wrappers, I thought we learned
that lesson a few months ago? A different vessel will yield the same
results as the Fast Fiasco... howzat go again... oh yeah...
"There aren't enough passengers
to keep the Ferry profitable over the long term".
Substitute 'Hovercraft' for 'Ferry'
and the theory still holds up. Rochester is a destination in name only.
At least a case could be made for a hovercraft service from
the Niagara Region to Toronto owing to the tremendous influx of Toronto
commuters moving down to the southern Canadian shore. That's a daily
commute from hell and I can see where a 'public transit' model might have a
semi-reasonable chance of working. Linking all the Golden Horseshoe
together.. as in 'filling in' the missing third side link... makes a fair amount
of sense although he cost factor remains to be seen. Still, housing is
considerably cheaper in the Niagara Region than in Metro Toronto and that's a
real draw for commuters looking for an alternative to an overcrowded and
overpriced GTA. It's really getting so people simply can't afford housing
in the GTA.
So... the little voice here in Native Canadianland
recommends Hover Transit Services try out the T.O. to St.Kitts route first and
see how it goes. Then examine the Hamilton route.
And just forget about a Rochester route. If drivers
and passengers are too squeamish - or too lazy - to drive the QEW from
Toronto-Rochester or Rochester-Toronto, that's sounds to me like more of a
personal problem which should be addressed with reality and not another boatload
of money.
Speaking of boatloads of money, looks like THAT arrival has
yet to meet up with CATS. Conventional wisdom has already written off the
Breeze so trying to jump-start a 'dead' ferry is going to take more than a few
loaded investors.
It'll take nothing less than a miracle... something which
has been in short supply of late in the Rochester area.
07
NOVEMBER 2004
Yeah, sure... THAT makes
sense, doesn't it?
![[News]](titler_News.gif) |
Sunday
November 07, 2004 |
|
![[Johnson: Ferry Docked Until Spring]](ferry_docked_92004.jpg) |
|
The "Breeze" was haulted in September |
Johnson: Ferry Docked
Until Spring
by Mary McCombs
by Jeff Hamson
Published Nov 06, 2004
The latest quote from
Rochester's Mayor Bill Johnson will have the fast ferry docked at the
Genesee River through the winter.
A published report says the Breeze won't set sail until at
least next spring.
This latest development is yet another disappointment for
vendors at the ferry terminal.
Many have been banking on business from the ferry and
wonder if they survive the winter.
"We're just going to have to wait
and see how bad it really gets. It's quite quiet right now, but we'll just
play it day by day for the time being," says vendor Joe Accorso.
(ed. Shrewd rationale, Joe. If business is
'quite quiet right now', what makes you think it's going to pick up if the
Ferry's sitting outside doing nothing but rusting for the next five months?)
Some vendors are hoping to re-negotiate their rent, until
the ferry is back in business.
"Hopefully, we could have a reduced
rent until the ferry comes back next year," says vendor Kiran Patel.
(ed. I believe that falls under
the category of 'Business Risk'... as in, there's always the risk of no
business for whatever reason. Reduced rent? Why?
The vendors accepted that risk when they rushed to sign the lease for fame
and fortune. No dice.)
Mayor Johnson says a spring start up gives time to resolve
issues that led to the ferry suspension.
The Fast Ferry
|
The blindly naive. Will they NEVER give it up?
"... a
reduced rent until
the ferry comes back next year..."
My. Aren't WE hopeful??
Hey I've got an idea! Why don't we just skip the rent altogether
until the Ferry starts up again?! That way, more taxpayer money
can go to prop up yet more private businesses!! Sounds like a plan, no?
These vendors rolled the dice...
and crapped out. That's business, that's life - which is a real shame, but
that's the way it goes when people are too quick to ignore reality in the face
of making a fast buck. It's not up to the taxpayer to have to foot the
bill for the error in judgment of a private company... including and especially
for CATS.
If the ferry terminal vendors are
too blind to read the writing on the wall and bail out before they go deeper
into debt, they're certainly welcomed to go under with the ship. They can
either cut their losses now... or amass greater debt and file Chapter 11 later;
the choice is entirely theirs, but whining to the taxpayers to reduce the rent
just ain't gonna cut it. Far too many public funds have already been spent
to cover this travesty and it's past time to put an end to that.
|
Spirit of Ontario to hibernate all winter
On the Web
For more details about the history of the ferry project and a library of
recent stories, go to
www.DemocratandChronicle.com and click on the "Fast Ferry Coverage."
|
(November 6, 2004) — Don't
expect the Spirit of Ontario to resume sailing this fall or winter.
"We pretty much agreed that this ferry isn't going to float again until
next spring," Mayor William A. Johnson Jr. said Friday.
There's no reason to rush the
ferry back into service until all of the issues that contributed to its
suspension of service are taken care of, he said.
(ed. Oh, you mean like the fact there aren't
enough passengers to support a project of this magnitude? Can't wait
to see how THAT'S going to be 'taken care of'.)
The ferry, one of the most anticipated projects in
recent Rochester history, started service to Toronto in June, but lasted
less than three months before shutting down without any warning to the
public. It now sits idle in the Genesee River at the Port of Rochester.
Many ferry supporters had hoped it would restart this
fall.
Canadian American Transportation Systems, the private ferry company,
blamed the stoppage on money problems and government bureaucracy. Since
then, CATS, its financial backers and city, state and federal officials
have been trying to figure out whether and when the service should resume.
CATS needs to raise new capital, restructure its debt,
increase revenue and reduce costs. The financial backers remain committed
to restarting the service here, Johnson added.
He also noted that the Toronto Port Authority is now
constructing a permanent terminal for the ferry — another reason not to
rush the ship back into operation. The facility is not expected to be
ready until at least January.
If the massive $42.5 million ferry doesn't resume
service until spring, it faces a winter docked in the Genesee River. It is
unclear what would happen to the ship in the meantime. The St. Lawrence
Seaway closes at the end of December, meaning the vessel could not leave
Lake Ontario.
CATS officials could not be reached for comment.
Elaine Hanford, owner of The Chestnut Tree gift shop at the Rochester
ferry terminal, was disappointed to hear that the ship wouldn't sail until
at least the spring. The Chestnut Tree is one of several shops and
eateries that opened in the facility this year.
"People do want it to start
up," she said. (ed. And
that analysis would be based on...?)
"It's a good thing for Rochester."
(ed. And that analysis
would be based on...?)
RARMON@DemocratandChronicle.com
|
Sheesh. Another excuse in
the making.
CATS: "We'll resume service on
April 1."
Toronto Port Authority:
"The terminal isn't going to be ready until June 1 due to unforeseen delays."
CATS: "You guys just torpedoed
our plans. It's not our fault the
service went under for the last time."
Toronto Port Authority: "Oh,
sorry. Looks like we'll just have to use the new terminal for our
contingency plans... you Rochester folks DID have a contingency plan for your
terminal in the event the Fast Ferry went belly up, DIDN'T YOU??"
The Mohawk
Prognosticator's Corner.
After a particularly brutal
Western New York winter, the ferry begins to look a tad tired and disheveled in
the spring. The hull takes on those nasty filth stains along with the
inevitable rust spots from sitting exposed to the elements all winter.
(Check out the 'lakers' that first cruise through the Welland Canal in the
spring for examples of how white hulls end up looking pretty cruddy from being
tied up for five months in grinding ice packs. Oh... that's right, I
forget. Most Rochesterians wouldn't know the Welland Canal from the
Suez Canal. Never mind.)
During the prolonged winter
absence, the locals are too preoccupied complaining about the weather to bother
thinking about some expensive boat which is ostensibly going to fire its engines
and make a Grand Re-entry in the spring. They forget about the thing and
go about moaning over perfectly normal climatic changes which happen on an
annual basis anyway.
Come spring, CATS hopes the
ill-will it generated from stiffing the passengers with useless tickets for
six-plus weeks will have faded from memory or at least have had the edge removed
a bit.
Seemingly oblivious to the fact
that "There aren't enough passengers
to keep the Ferry profitable over the long term", CATS nonetheless
dives headfirst back into the same mire which led to suspending service the
previous September. A little time and distance from the underlying reason
for the first flop (along with barges of cash from the White Knight investors
who've stepped in to save the day), and CATS feels re-energized to give it
another go.
There's a saying by some notable along the lines of "Making
a mistake isn't being stupid... but making the same mistake over and over IS".
There's another saying which may be relevant here as well: "Fool me once, shame
on you. Fool me twice, shame on me".
We won't be fooled again. Once was
MORE than enough.
So it looks like the showdown, if indeed there's going be
one at all, is going to be postponed until spring. I can see the entire
service quietly fading into oblivion
("Hey... whatever happened to that fast ferry?")
but I'll be generous and give CATS the benefit of the doubt and say they might
actually have the guts and stupidity to re-launch the service which will be met
by a thunderous silence.
That's the prediction from this chunk of cyber-space.
Rest assured, THIS website isn't going to let the thing die a quiet death as
this is one local gaffe which is going to be thrown back in the faces of the
local 'leaders' for years to come. If CATS thinks it can simply sweep this
mess under the carpet, they've got another thought coming.
Stay tuned. The nitrogenous waste will be hitting the
fan as often as is deemed appropriate.
Courtesy of your irascible Native Canadian.
|
"...Recently the two women performed
Clean Irene for audiences in a theatre in Rochester, N.Y., where the
previous show was I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change. It's an
experience Parry describes as demoralizing. "They didn't dislike it; they
didn't really get it. And that show is quite an accessible one."
It makes me wonder what our
friends and neighbours in Rochester (alas, it
will take more than a ill-fated ferry service to bridge our cities)
will make of the dub poet, actor and story teller d'bi.young."
(full
article) |
|
By KAMAL AL-SOLAYLEE
Friday, November 5, 2004 - Page R29 |
Mr. Al-Solayee tells it like it is. The social
differences between Toronto and Rochester are many, varied and significant.
In Toronto, the avant-garde is accepted (or at least tolerated); in Rochester
it's a source for ridicule, scorn and completely blank faces. No, it's a
tremendous understatement to say "Rochester just doesn't get it".
From the web archives:
Dear Rochester,
When someone accuses you of being a provincial hick
town with not a lot going on, and this rankles you, the best thing
would be to not
react in a provincial hick town fashion.
For those people living outside of Rochester, some
Canadian celebrity entertainment journalist recently wrote a “Why
would anyone want to go to Rochester” column in a Toronto paper, (A
ferry is being built to travel in between Rochester and Toronto).
Whatever. Typical page C fair directed at people who weren’t going to
come to Rochester in the first place.
Well, then Rochester’s mayor held a press conference
about it, and then the radio talk show crows started crowing and then
all of Rochester™ had it’s knickers in a twist because someone
took some easy pot shots at our large town.
The real embarrassment was the above linked Democrat
and Chronicle newspaper article. If it was trying to be a clever and
witty retort, it failed miserably. You ate at … Planet Hollywood? You
were staying at the Best Western on Carton and drove
to City Hall and took a cab to the CN tower? It’s called a subway or,
*gasp* walking.
Worse, it ran on the front page of the paper.
Note to Rochester; No one in Toronto noticed. I was
up there last weekend (last minute on a whim, apologies to any crew I
may or may not have up there) and my several mentions of being from
Rochester garnered no reaction.
Rochester is what it is, a largish town with some
hints of metropolitan life and easy access to some very nice parks and
decent wine country. Stop trying to impress Toronto socialites and
start trying to appeal to the demographic that would consider a brief
vacation here, or else the only people riding to Rochester on that
ferry are going to be those returning from their trip up north.
|
"... a provincial hick town with not
a lot going on.."?? GEEZ! Now just how on Earth could
such an assessment ever be made about Rochester, hmmm?
From a local hausfrau's website:
|
|
|
JSCG Home Page
» Tuesday, December 02, 2003 |
http://junkstorecowgirl.com/archives/002415.html |
|
Comments? (13)
Oh Yeah? Well, I Don't Like Toronto, Either!
Rochester woke up this morning to a headline article in
the Democrat and Chronicle informing us that another
reporter from Toronto has called Rochester poopy. This time it's
Jan Wong in a Globe and Mail story on Saturday.
This same story was discussed today by the guy who took the place of
Bob Lonsberry on WGOP WHAM.
Ms. Wong cited "several important reasons" why
Torontonians would never want to visit Rochester when the
Fast Ferry between Rochester and Toronto goes into operation
(supposedly in May 2004). Included are reasons like the homicide
rate in the city, declining work force at Kodak,
the Garbage Plate served at Nick Tahou's, and the fact
that George Eastman shot himself to death in his East
Avenue Mansion.
I decline to dignify those last three reasons with a
response. As for the homicide rate, Mayor Bill Johnson was quoted in the
article as noting that most of the homicides are "execution style hits.
Only a couple times a year (does) a purely innocent person get shot."
Ms. Wong noted how it's supposedly dangerous to venture
into the neighborhood where the
Susan B. Anthony House is located. It's in a rough
neighborhood, but I've visited the Anthony House with our son and my
mother and we all lived to tell about it. You just have to use your head
no matter where you are.
Don't like it in Rochester, Jan? Well, honey, the
feeling's mutual. Rochester's no Toronto, but Toronto ain't New York City,
either. As I've been saying quietly for years, I'd rather save up my money
and go to New York City every second or third year than go to Toronto on
an annual basis.
The last time I was in Toronto, which admittedly was
several years ago, the Eaton Centre (the giant downtown
mall) was past its prime, as was the Ontario Place
waterfront amusement center. The Ontario Science Centre I
remembered so fondly from my youth looked like it had stopped evolving and
was about to be naturally selected. The art galleries and museums can't
hold a matchstick to those of New York. Plays? There's a reason why
they're called BROADWAY musicals. Sure, Toronto's got good restaurants
like New York. So what? We do here, too. And not just Nick Tahous, baby!
Posted at December 2, 2003 09:18 AM
Category:
Housewife on the Edge
Comments and Trackbacks
I think you need a nice soothing day to calm down from
this ruckus - perhaps you should go christmas shopping at the mall?
Spending $ always makes one happier don't you think? Perhaps maybe about
$1750 more, mmmm? (that should shoot the total up near my guess of
$2250!)Posted by:
cindy | Dec 2, 2003 4:04 PM
Thanks for the chuckle, Cindy! But I'm pretty sure $2,250
is more than we spent on our wedding!Posted by:
Linda | Dec 2, 2003 4:18 PM
This rant looks a bit different than it did this morning.
But I agree with you. I do like Toronto (of course I did spend my
wedding night there, but that was almost 19 years ago!), but it would
benefit them just as much as Rochester to have this ferry succeed. I
should think that they would want all those American dollars coming to
their city. Alienating the other end of the ferry is not a very smart
thing to do.Posted by:
Liz | Dec 2, 2003 7:28 PM
Hi Liz. Captain Weblog made me edit it. He doesn't like
it when my rants are too long. Must be too much like real life or
something.Posted by: Linda | Dec
2, 2003 8:34 PM
I would think he'd rather read them than listen to them!!
Posted by: Liz | Dec 2, 2003
10:11 PM
Don's sister who lives in Canada, said The Globe and Mail
had many letters in opposition to Jan Wong's article and praising
Rochester.Posted by:
Hi C | Dec 13, 2003 5:55 AM
Rochester has it's problems just like any other city in
the u.s. but i have been living here all my life and i've seen what this
city used to be and what it has become today which is very sad. I'm all
for the ferry to come to Rochester and belive for the short term that
the only ones that are going to benefit from this are the Canandians.
Maybe down the road if we can get our act togheter and vote for
ploiticians that really give to @#@# maybe it will put us on the map.
Jan Wong Was a litte to criticle but I do have to agree with her on what
she wrote about this city. What is there to do here??? Yes once outside
this city limits it is very beautiful but monroe county is for the
birds.Posted by:
Robert | Jan 10, 2004 4:48 PM
Let the record reflect that this is a different Robert,
not my Robert.Posted by: Linda |
Jan 10, 2004 10:42 PM
Having lived in both cities, I have my opinions. Jan in
neither right or wong, oops, wrong. Parts of Rochester's core are
shameful. Same is true for Toronto. Toronto once tried to fix this by
moving the problem north to Finch. Most people visiting T.O. do not get
that far into North York. It use to take me 1.5 to 2 hours to commute
each day. I'm down to around 6 minutes each way. For what I paid for a
house in T.O., I could buy 5 in Rochester (or 2 in nicer communities). I
know that in Rochester if I need a (more likely when I need) a heart
specialist, I'll see one the same week. Not likely in Ontario, 6 to 12
month waiting list. There is a reason they travel to Buffalo, and it
ain't football or the Gallaria Mall. Toronto has it's perks. Great
people. More entertainment than you can shake a stick at, hockey,
theater, dining, shopping and of course the Canadian Ballet. The TTC
runs fairly well. Great beer. No city should be judged by a two day
visit. For now, I'll choose Rochester. But I'll always visit T.O.
Posted by: Jay | Jan 12, 2004 11:42 AM
Nick Tahou's is a staple of Rochester. Maybe the
Canadians do not get American food.
Posted by: Owen | Jan 13,
2004 4:18 PM
I landed on this page by accident and decided to give it
a read. I'm a Toronto resident and I can't believe the bashing going on
here! One little article in the Globe has gotten everyone pretty fired
up. The ferry is going to bring economic benefits to both sides of the
boarder - is that not fairly clear?? I was actually considering a trip
down to Rochester but, the close minded comments on this page make me
think otherwise. I'm really surprised actually, I thought I wouldn't
hear comments like that from a border city.
I wanted to respond to Jay's Jan 12th comment. I live at Yonge and Finch
and I would like to know exactly what problems have been "moved" to
North York? I grew up in North York and it's actually one of the best
kept, prosperious and environmentally conscious suburbs of Toronto. The
schools are top notch and attract well to do residents who want to
provide the best for their kids. It's a shame that more tourists don't
take the TTC a few more stops north and check out the performing arts
centre, ice skate at the North York civic centre or dine at the various
restaurants and bistros.
What do you think goes on at Finch exactly? I loved it so much that
after moving back from Miami I decided to purchase a condo at Yonge and
Finch - no slums here. It's great to hear that land value in Rochester
is so low but, it's not a world class city - what do you expect?
Posted by: Julia | Jan 19,
2004 1:20 PM
The city of Toronto made a decision to move public
housing projocts out of the downtown core to the Jane & Finch corridor.
The West end of Finch, far from the pretty attractions of Mel Lastman
Square!Posted by:
Jay | Jan 20, 2004 5:56 AM
Public or "Ontario Housing" projects, including co-ops,
have been distributed throughout the city and since the creation of the
GTA it's been easier for municipalities to distribute the locations even
more into the surrounding suburbs. Many of the cities seniors and new
immigrants live in such buildings. My grandparents did for more than 20
years. Jane and Finch has been a transitional neighbourhood since its
inception - that's a fact, there's nothing to hide. Public housing isn't
going to change that.Posted by:
Julia | Jan 20, 2004 1:32 PM
|
No comment necessary. The above website really says
it all.
And now, a Golden Oldie from the Mayor of Rochester New
York:
|

"The fast ferry will
open another trade corridor with Canada; provide competitive shipping for
local companies; and transport tons of visitors who will spend their
dollars throughout the Greater Rochester and Finger Lakes regions, thereby
expanding jobs and business opportunities.
To hear some people talk
about the viability of the ferry, you would think Greater Rochester is an
economic dinosaur and a cultural backwater. Of course people from
Canada will come to Rochester! We are blessed with a richness of
cultural assets and resources that other communities, big and small, can
only dream about.
I have no doubt that the
ferry and the planned redevelopment of the port will produce significant
and sustained economic benefits. The cynics will be proven wrong." |
|
(
link ) |
Mayor William A. Johnson, Jr.
Ninth State of the City Address
March 3, 2003
Hochstein Music School |
Well, OK. I guess nobody can be right 100% of
the time... even Hizzoner. Giggles are permitted; outright guffaws are
discouraged.
Cynics : 1 City Hall : 0
Game over.
eh, eh? ???
Ciao