Page Fourteen  

20 NOVEMBER 2004

A bit of a sardonic view from from the state that gave us George W. Bush; The Sequel.

As one ferry halts, local plan proceeds

Port authority foresees success
Saturday, September 11, 2004
Sarah Hollander

Plain Dealer Reporter

Just as Cleveland begins interviewing potential operators for a ferry across Lake Erie to Canada, another Great Lakes ferry service has docked its ship indefinitely.

Less than three months in operation, the ballyhooed Rochester-to-Toronto ferry halted service this week.

Major debt, extensive red tape, high fuel costs, government fees and delays in permission to carry lucrative freight trucks sunk the venture, according to a statement from Canadian American Transportation Systems.

Despite that ferry's troubles, proponents of a trans-Erie ferry from Cleveland to Port Stanley, Ontario, remain undeterred.

"We know what the costs are and what the market is," said Gary Failor, executive director of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.

The port authority hopes to finish interviews with seven interested ferry operators by the end of the month and launch the service in April 2006.

A port-commissioned study considered potential obstacles and concluded that the ferry could make money, Failor said. Unlike in Rochester, where the state of New York subsidized the ferry, the operator would assume all financial risk. That, Failor said, will dissuade any operators who don't have either the experience or finances to make the venture successful.  (ed. Say it: "Like CATS...")

Cleveland's plans also include a more "practical vessel," as opposed to the high-speed Rochester ferry, which had movie theaters and duty-free shops, Failor said. And truck traffic is greater around Lake Erie than Lake Ontario, he said. Commercial truckers will find the ferry attractive because it will save them travel time as well as offering on-board customs checks, Failor said.

The Rochester-Toronto service hopes to return to business as early as next spring. In the meantime, there's an example of a successful ferry operation to the west.

A ferry linking Milwaukee to Muskegon, Mich., for example, also began operating in June. The operator has canceled some trips because of rough weather, but passenger interest has been higher than anticipated.

On Friday, the local port authority board voted to extend a contract for Theis Marine Consulting by six months. Stuart Theis, who has worked on the ferry project for the past 18 months, will now focus on negotiating with operators.

While plans are moving ahead, some major issues remain. The Canadian government, for example, plans to transfer ownership of the port at Port Stanley to a private company, which could complicate negotiations.  (ed. Heh-heh-heh!  You Americans don't think Canadians pay attention to what's going on with the noisy neighbours to the south, do you?  Instead of Americans capitalizing on the Canadian entity, by all accounts it's the other way around.)

And the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority needs money to build a ferry terminal on Dock 28 and has its hopes set on winning federal grants.

To read the port's ferry feasibility study, go to www.portofcleveland.com.

Plain Dealer reporter Molly Kavanaugh contributed to this story.

To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:

shollander@plaind.com, 216-999-4816
© 2004 The Plain Dealer.

Have to admit it; telling the prospective ferry operators if they fail they'll be preparing their own nooses (right after digging their own graves) is a real motivator to cross every 't' and dot every 'i' BEFORE shoving off for the first time.  Maybe if CATS knew it would be responsible for any and all debts they incurred, they would have been far more cautious and attentive to every last detail.

I'd like to know specifically what repercussions CATS and its management 'team' will be suffering as a direct result of its sloppy and careless ineptitude.   Or will they simply recycle the unused letterhead, auction off the office furniture and that'll be the end of it? 

There's most assuredly a matter of accountability at stake here.  And from all indicators, the worse that'll happen to the CATS folks is a very severe case of finger-pointing.   Big Woo.  Why should the residents and taxpayers of this area be forced to pay for something which has added nothing but debt to the community?  A rip-off of this magnitude skirts very close to the definition of misrepresentation and fraud and to let these guys off with a "Ooooo... we're SO mad.." seems only to invite others to try to pull a stunt like this again.

[News]
Saturday   November 20, 2004
[CATS Says City
Cornel Martin blasts city leaders

CATS Says City "Stole" Ferry Plan

 

by Stephanie Dusek

photo by Nate Kramer

Published Nov 19, 2004

CATS president Cornel Martin says Mayor William Johnson’s plan is almost a carbon copy of the plan the ferry operator has been working on.

Martin says the city took CATS plan, and then added something CATS couldn't do as a private company; $40 million in bonding.

CATS says the city was able to make a better offer that would pay the lenders outright.

“The city has basically after all their criticism of CATS management and our abilities to run this ferry, they've taken our very plan, put it on city letterhead and put it on the internet as their plan. This is outrageous,” CATS president Cornel Martin said.

Martin says CATS will speak again with its lenders on Monday. It's also going to see about possible legal action against the city.

Adventures in Smallville USA.  Fighting over who gets the chance to take control of a doomed business.

"This is outrageous", claims CATS President Cornel Martin.  Such language.  Such petulance.  Such idiocy.

Whose side am I on?  Neither.  The city of Rochester  has no business in the ferry business and CATS has sure proved *IT* has no business in the ferry business.  There simply isn't enough business for the ferry business in the Rochester area and everybody would be better served if they simply admitted as much.  End of discussion.

Floating bonds, revamping ferry service schedules, targeting the commercial trucking market, tossing out management... none of these will do anything to convince Toronto-area residents to cram the boat or Rochester-area residents to venture forth by the thousands to a destination which couldn't be more accessible than it already is.

The local bickering is amusing at best and thoroughly embarrassing at worst.  To say there's no evidence of any 'leadership' should be a foregone conclusion.... which is a REAL insult to these Suits who easily spend half their time and energy proving there IS and they ARE.  Someone should  step up and say, "Hey, let's stop pretending it's inconceivable this project could fail.  Anything's possible... including the demise of the ferry service."

Man!  Would there be some furiously flushed fat necks after hearing THAT or what?!   But that's the only position which hasn't been raised publicly so far and that's an indicting assessment on the state of reality within the local community business and political 'leaders'.  The ferry couldn't succeed even before it set forth on the maiden voyage and denying the obvious proof is irresponsible and futile.  Throwing yet more good money after bad won't do anything to persuade or inspire the residents of the two respective communities to get off their butts and hop on some superfluous method of transit.

All this posturing, wheeling and dealing and Grand Plans are blithely overlooking the most pivotal aspect of what will either make or break the service once and for all: the paying public.  Without the support of the passengers meeting the forecasted capacity levels, what difference do good intentions make?  The public has spoken: 'We think the fast ferry is nice, but not needed'.  Local business and political 'leaders' can't seem to accept that pronouncement and maintain 'No, it's not just nice, it's NEEDED' and are resorting to ludicrous measures to ensure the ferry stays afloat.

It's over.  Get used to it.  And move on.

Saturday, November 20, 2004 Rochester, NY
Democrat and Chronicle
 Home > News > Local News  
Rochester Time: 8:08 pm  
[]
Ferry rescue plan calls for city takeover
More on the Web
 
  • To see the city business plan, go to the City of Rochester's Proposed ferry plan (PDF file)
  • Rick Armon and Frank Bilovsky
    Staff writers

    (November 20, 2004) — City officials released their business plan Friday to justify buying the private high-speed ferry service and turning it into a publicly run operation.

    The city plan calls for the creation of a public authority — the Rochester Port and Ferry Authority — that would issue $40 million in government-backed bonds to buy the massive vessel and oversee the business.

    "It's better to try this way than to hope and pray that someone comes along with a solution," said Mayor William A. Johnson Jr., who believes a public takeover is the only way to save the popular service.

    The authority would raise the necessary cash through the bond sale, although taxpayers could be liable if revenues didn't meet expenses in any year.

    The operator of the ferry, Canadian American Transportation Systems, sent out a strong signal late Friday that it might resist the city's offer to buy the ship. In a press conference, CATS President Cornel Martin accused the city of stealing the company's business plan.

    "The city's adversarial conduct strikes us clearly as a hostile takeover," Martin said. "CATS will no longer stand by while the city tries to unethically and possibly illegally destroy the business CATS has created. ... They are trying to steal our ferry. They will not steal our business."

    City officials did not have the opportunity to comment.

    If the city takes over the ferry, at least the city would have a tangible asset to sell if the service founders again, leaving little risk to taxpayers, said Edward Doherty, the city's environmental services commissioner and former budget director, who wrote the 30-page plan.

    The $42.5 million Spirit of Ontario — a vessel that can carry up to 774 passengers and 238 cars — made its last voyage between Rochester and Toronto on Sept. 7 after less than three months in operation. CATS said it was bleeding money. U.S. taxpayers have invested about $50 million in the project — in the ship itself, in the ferry terminal constructed at the port and in the surrounding infrastructure.

    City officials are now trying to negotiate a deal to buy the ship from CATS.

    The plan

    Johnson said city officials learned from mistakes made by the ferry company and built their business plan on conservative assumptions. For example, the plan estimates that 385,705 passengers — or about 416 per trip — would ride the ship annually. CATS had estimated that 450,000 riders were needed before the operation would break even.  (ed.  And of course, if we 'estimate' the number of passengers that makes it a 'certainty', doesn't it?)

    The plan projects operating revenue in the first year would total $19.5 million and expenses $20.3 million, including $4.6 million in debt payments. The authority also would have a $4 million reserve fund available to cover the first-year loss.

    Revenues would outpace expenses and the reserve fund would increase in subsequent years because of smaller debt payments, Doherty said.

    The debt would be spread out over a 15-year period. There also is an option for 20 years.

    Johnson said he welcomed scrutiny of the plan. City Council is expected to hold a public hearing on it.

    Key elements

    Other key elements:

     

  • The ship and other necessary assets would be purchased for $42.1 million, with $1.8 million set aside for startup capital and $4 million for the reserve fund or working capital. The $42 million includes a $6.6 million state loan and a $1.3 million city loan already invested in the project.

     

  • The authority must earn at least $30.31 per passenger to make the project viable. (ed. And if it doesn't??)  Specific ticket prices were not set in the plan, considering they would vary for walk-ons, people who brought vehicles and those who used the business class.

    CATS charged $28 per adult walk-on passenger, but also tacked on surcharges that totaled $4 for northbound passengers and $3 for southbound riders. Adults who brought cars on the ship were charged $20.

     

  • About 5,480 trucks or buses would use the ferry in the first year, or about six per trip. The vessel can hold only 10 at one time. The average truck or bus fare would be $260.

    Doherty said companies such as Eastman Kodak Co., Wegmans Foods Markets Inc. and American Rock Salt Co. are interested in using the ferry.

     

  • Other annual income would come from food and beverage sales ($1.39 per passenger), duty-free/gift shop sales ($1.12 per passenger) and $800,000 in advertising sales in the first year and $1 million in subsequent years.

     

  • Other annual expenses include $6.3 million for fuel, $1.2 million for insurance, $400,000 for customs fees in Canada and $200,000 to lease a ferry terminal in Toronto. (ed. And of course, rent rarely - if ever - increases.)

     

  • The ship would make two daily round trips between mid- April and mid-October, and only one round trip four days a week during the off-season months.

     

  • The operation would employ 28 full-time and 144 part-time workers.

    Uncertainty

    Some experts questioned whether the figures in the business plan were realistic.

    "I think they are being somewhat sensible in that they are not using these outlandish marketing studies that CATS did to promote the thing," said Rochester Institute of Technology management professor Robert Barbato. "I think they are being reasonably conservative about this. They've done the best they can, but there really is uncertainty."

    He has concerns about using figures from the first summer of operations as a basis for future ridership, since the ferry benefited from discounted ticketing in August and the service's novelty.

    All business plans are speculations for the future, Barbato said.

    Charles Wasley, an associate professor of accounting at University of Rochester's William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration, agreed that it was not prudent to take an initial business plan at face value, especially one coming from the public sector.

    "As with all government-run programs, you have to have a healthy dose of skepticism."

    Both Wasley and Barbato questioned whether annual income of $1 million from advertising was a realistic number.  (ed. Sure!  Advertising some local horsetrack, the local Marriott or the ambiance of Appleby's is
    JUST the eye-grabbing crap tourists strain to read!  Don't they?)

    "Has anybody been willing to step up and sign a contract for that?" Wasley asked. 

    Johnson said the city must act quickly if the service is to resume in April as hoped. The senior lenders, principally the Export Finance and Insurance Corp., an arm of the Australian government, is interested in recouping its $22.5 million investment in the venture and already has potential buyers.

    EFIC has expressed support for the city plan, Johnson said.

    The city needs to save the ferry because of its financial investment at the port and because the tourist attraction sets Rochester apart from other mid-size cities, Johnson said. (ed.
    Oh!  So your career's on the line, is it?) The city and state also could lose millions if the ship sails away because of complicated loan agreements that allow the senior lenders to be repaid before the local governments, he added.

    "A lot of us have a lot of egg on our face if this thing doesn't work," he said.  (ed. Start wiping.)

    If the Spirit of Ontario is turned into a public service, it wouldn't be the only government-run ferry operation in the United States. For example, New York City operates the Staten Island Ferry. Alaska runs the Marine Highway Ferry System. And Washington state operates Washington State Ferries in Seattle and British Columbia.

    The call to create a public authority comes at the same time that state leaders are trying to crack down on independent authorities, which have had a history of scandal and mismanagement. Both state Comptroller Alan Hevesi and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer have backed legislation to reform the way authorities do business and make them more transparent.

    RARMON@DemocratandChronicle.com

  • Just when you thought the party was over, looks like the REAL action is about to start.

    [News]
    Tuesday   November 23, 2004
    [City and CATS Battle Over Ferry]
    The embattled ferry is still docked.

    City and CATS Battle Over Ferry

     

    by Liz Medhin

    file photo

    Published Nov 20, 2004

    Mayor Bill Johnson and CATS officials are going head to head over the Fast Ferry. Johnson wants the city to take control of the vessel. CATS officials say it is theirs, and accuses the city of stealing.

    "We're outraged. This is an outrage,” CATS President Cornel Martin said.

    “We have worked in good faith with the city and the lenders to try to put the ferry back into service. The city has basically, after all of their criticism of CATS management and our abilities, they've taken our very plan, put it on city letterhead, and put it on the Internet as their plan.”

    Mayor Bill Johnson says to accuse the city of stealing is "absolutely ludicrous." He is calling on CATS to make its proposal to both the city and the lenders public. He says only then will people see the differences between the two plans.

    In a statement released Saturday, Johnson says after lenders told CATS its proposal was rejected and the city would buy the ferry. Johnson said, "CATS officials voluntarily made their senior staff members available to us and voluntarily showed us their books and operational details."

    Johnson says the city developed its own plan based on input from many sources including the CATS operation plan and senior lenders. Even though CATS is now contemplating legal action against the city, Mayor Johnson says the company knew about the city's plans for the ferry.

    In his statement, Johnson goes on to say "rather than accusing us of thievery, CATS need to come to the realization that their unwillingness to deal with the city represents their decision to deprive the people of Rochester, as well as the greater Rochester area, of the only hope left to revive the ferry."

    However, CATS says that was not the case when money troubles first began months ago.

    "Had the city been willing to work with CATS as they agreed to under our original lease management agreement, agreed to helping us try to secure additional loan guarantees, had they been willing to do that with us, we are absolutely confident the lender would have been willing to accept CATS plan going forward," Martin said.

    Martin says he originally asked the city to loan the company $6 million in case the project failed after a year. It's something the lenders wanted to see in order to get the ferry up and running again.

    However, the city gave lenders another alternative: instead of loaning CATS the $6 million, the city would buy the ferry for $40 million using bonds, something a private entity like CATS could not do.

    The Breeze

    All this begs the question, "Why?"  "..represents their decision to deprive the people of Rochester, as well as the greater Rochester area, of the only hope left to revive the ferry."

    Yeah... SO??  Just what makes these 'leaders' believe (1) the residents of the Rochester area even care anymore whether the ferry floats or sinks and (2) that this project could fly in the first place?

    It's not as if the taxpayers haven't resigned themselves to having to foot the bill of yet another corporate-driven initiative endorsed by public officials which flopped.  I think we're just haggling over the final price here.

    The longer the ferry debacle remains unresolved, the bigger the bill.  The sheer magnitude of money which has been already been lost is the REAL motivating aspect which keeps the ever-hopeful flogging this dead horse.  Embarrassingly, the city of Rochester bought into a nag which should have been sent to pasture instead of the starting gate and now looks pretty foolish for doing so.  The opportunity for saving face has  L O N G  since passed.

    CATS, still believing its goose can lay the Golden Egg, fights back in bid to hang on to its ticket to fame and the right house in the right neighbourhood for its executives.  What borders on the pathological is the supporters' resolute conviction the ferry project is still economically feasible and worth saving.  It's not and shouldn't be.  That isn't stopping business and political interests from trying to make it so.

    Canada:  The Good of the Many comes before the Good of the Few.  U.S.:  The Good of the Few comes before the Good of the Many".  Translation:  In the States, corporate interests are given higher priorities than the collective society which supports them.... the Fast Ferry fiasco is a case in point.  Conventional Wisdom would suggest the community at large should be given the option to decide whether the ferry is allowed to operate or not... it is, after all, the public's money which permitted the operation to even get off the ground in the first place.

    Instead, the We-Know-What's'-Best-For-You attitude strikes again and business and political 'leaders' take it upon themselves to presume public opinion... based on __what__ ?  A few local media 'polls'?  A handful of 'supporters' waddling around the terminal with placards imploring "Save Our Ferry"?  The huddling of a very select and insulated business 'leaders' who can't imagine anyone NOT having the Myrtle Beach getaway timeshare?

    Vox populii has never been so ignored... even when the proven LACK of numbers spoke clearly and with authority.  I think the phrase "Ignore at your own peril" is appropriate.

    But then, Mayor Johnson and CEO Martin haven't exactly been sending out requests for input from local Native Canadians.  That's too bad; there's a distinct possibility that one Mohawk's opinion just might be inexplicably right on the money.

    And wouldn't THAT be a strange turn of events?

    The Democrat & Chronicle's perpetually sage advice:

      Tuesday, November 23, 2004 Rochester, NY
    Democrat and Chronicle
     Home > Opinion > Editorials
    Rochester Time: 10:03 am   
    []
    Saving the ferry

    The mayor's bold proposal should be met with deliberate review.
    What do you think?
    Send us your thoughts about the mayor's plan to revive the ferry. E-mail dceditpage@democratandchronicle.com or fax (585) 258-2356.
     

    (November 21, 2004) — Credit Mayor William A. Johnson and his staff for wading into the unpleasant financial waters lapping at the moored high-speed ferry.

    The mayor's probably right when he says that unless the community acts to rescue the project, the whole thing will sink like a $42 million stone. And it's also apparent that the private sector has retreated, put off, perhaps, by the same uncertainties that stymied the initial ferry operation after only 80 days.

    The mayor's $40 million plan to take over the ferry, and the business, has many positives. It would bring into public ownership a truly valuable asset, the huge, beautifully appointed catamaran that in a short time became an object of local pride and fascination. It would preserve $50 million in public funds already invested. It would allow the ferry to continue to spur regional tourism.

    But there's too much public money at stake — and make no mistake, government bonds sold through public authorities obligate the taxpayer — to rush this thing through. This merits the city appointing the sort of blue-ribbon panel that County Executive Maggie Brooks commissioned to study county finances.

    Let regional business leaders and economists study the short- and long-term potential — and pitfalls. The analysis should be informed by public hearings before, during and after the review process.

    The questions, and skepticism, have been piling up since the mayor first aired his plan last week. If the original developers, Canadian American Transportation Systems, failed Ferry 101, and no other private entity wants at it, why is it a good idea to have the taxpayer further involved?

    Or why create yet another authority, given that New York authorities are notoriously partisan, secretive and wanton warehouses of debt? The state comptroller is already pushing for major reforms.

    The mayor has a viable plan. But then again, CATS' plan looked viable, too, so much so that the city and state poured millions into something that was fundamentally flawed. It was a hurry-up deal that went belly-up. This time, our leaders must be much more careful.

    "THIS time"?  What about "LAST time"?

    You know, when the City of Rochester and State of New York dove headfirst into furnishing the necessary cash to a private company?  The entire ferry concept would never had been anything more than a pipe-dream of some over-zealous private concern had local government said, "We'll pass".  Period.  That would have been the end of it... as well as the tens of millions of dollars which were ultimately dumped into this deal by the public.

    Had CATS been told, "Thanks, but no thanks" back in 2001, it's extremely difficult to see how there would be any angst about public money lost - or to be lost - at this point.  Claiming the Village Idiot failed his entrance exam to Stanford does nothing to absolve those who expected him to pass; and the political faction is as fully responsible for the ferry's demise as is CATS.  "Gee... we had NO idea" has no place explaining how the public lost tens of millions of dollars at a time when the local area is sinking into an economic abyss.

    The D&C editorial is as bland as should be expected.  Hurling the fire-and-brimstone voice of the residents isn't exactly a hallmark of the local rag.  Nice, tepid, cautious conservatism is the Order of the Century for the Democrat & Chronicle... screaming outrage is too reactionary and truthful to expect as the readership is awash in some dreamworld of their own creation.  I'm not suggesting mobs with torches should be storming the ferry terminal, but one would think locals would recognize the error in judgment by CATS and say, "Enough".

    Instead, the local fishwrapper admits the project was 'fundamentally flawed' yet urges caution when proceeding forth on this 'fundamentally flawed' project 'this time'.  Truly the Banana Republic of New York state.

     

    23 NOVEMBER 2004

    Ferry Update 

    (Rochester, NY) 11/22/04 - No new ferry business plan has come from CATS yet that compares with the one the city put out last week.

    CATS has accused the city of stealing their plan. The mayor has denied stealing the CATS plan.

    The mayor's plan would finance acquisition of the ship with $40 million, estimating the ship would carry about 385,000 passengers a year. (ed.  And if it doesn't, who's going to repay the $40 million in bonds??)

    If the City of Rochester buys the ferry, state lawmakers would have to create a Port Authority to oversea operations.

     

    Once again, there's no hint of 'HOW' the estimated passenger figure of 385,000 was arrived at.  "Experts say...", "Studies have shown..." or even "Madame Zelda's cards said..." could all be examined for accuracy and validity, yet it's this very number upon which the entire future of the fast ferry business is dependant.  If the 'estimated' number of passengers isn't met (a very real possibility given past performance), it doesn't matter how many commercial trucks use the service, or how many ferry t-shirts are sold or even whether Clyde and Maudie had a swell time.  The result will be the same; suspended operations.

    Predicting the fickle public's next move is about as scientific as forecasting next year's hit movie.  Given that sort of uncertainty, it makes no sense to latch onto 'estimated' numbers - with the hope they'll come true - as a green light to dump more millions into a failed venture .  There are no guarantees in life, of course, but with a modicum of knowledge and common sense it shouldn't be too much of a stretch to know Torontonians aren't going to be wringing their hands in despair over the loss of a fast ferry service to Rochester, regardless of how slick a tourism pitch there may be.

    That's not rude temerity, that's pragmatic realism.

    [News]
    Tuesday   November 23, 2004
    [CATS Founder Speaks on Ferry Plan]
     

    CATS Founder Speaks on Ferry Plan

    by Stephanie Dusek

    Published Nov 23, 2004

    While talks continue to try and save the fast ferry, so do the rifts between CATS and the City of Rochester.

    CATS founder Dominick Delucia brought the fast ferry to Rochester. Now he's fighting to keep it here.

    “In five long gruelling years CATS has never quit on this project," Delucia said. (ed. And this would be a good thing?  Specifically, for whom?)

    The ferry partnership between CATS and the City of Rochester has soured. Each will fight to see their plan save the ferry.

    “We believe that the lenders were critical of our plan in large part due to the fact that the city entered into direct competition with CATS’ proposal by offering to pay the Australians off in full," Delucia said.

    Rochester city Attorney Linda Kingsley says the city didn't step in with an offer to buy the ferry, until after lenders turned down cats business plan.

    “The subject of the city acquiring the ferry never came up until after the lenders unanimously rejected CATS’ proposal."

    CATS president Cornell Martin said last week that the city stole CATS' business plan and added $40 million in bonding. That’s something private company CATS can't do.

    CATS has yet to release details of its plan, or even confirm it has another one on the table.

    “If they're gonna say they had a workable plan, and say we stole their plan, they need to show you what the plan was that was rejected," Kingsley said.

    The only thing CATS and the city seem to agree on is that they must continue talking, or risk losing the ferry. Foreclosure is a possibility.

    "Recovering should be done in an open, honest private-public partnership without waste of resources and talents. The only sound, intelligent solution is a partnership," Delucia said.

    "We would be more than happy to have it stay in private hands. This is only a last resort measure to keep the ferry from leaving," Kingsley said.

    The Breeze
     

    Hey... maybe there IS a saving grace on the horizon.

    Apparently, EFIC (the Australian lenders and holders of the 'title' to the ferry) flatly rejected CATS' plans for restarting the service a few weeks ago.  Guess that's not the sort of news CATS was too thrilled to share?

    Anyway, EFIC can step in and foreclose on the ferry due to the fact that the thing hasn't made a trip in months and therefore shows no promise of making a profit by sitting still with a legal wheellock.   Rather than take back some weather-beaten boat after sitting through an Upstate winter, EFIC may be mere days away from sending the Repo-Man flying into the Greater Rochester Airport unannounced to protect their investment.

    So while CATS and the City of Rochester are engaged in Hissy Fits of 2004, EFIC could just put a very undignified end to the squabbling by saying, "Enough."   Auction?  Loss of all public investment in the ferry and terminal?  Hurt puppy-faces on the terminal businesses?  Lawsuits getting thick and furious?  Accusations bordering on public duels?  Toronto blackballing Rochester business?  State of New York drops a vicious rap on the knuckles of Rochester political circle?

    Sheesh.  They keep this up and Hollywood's going to make movie of this disaster... you can't make this sort of nonsense up even with the best screenwriters.  New York Times bestseller: "Fast Fiasco: The Story of the Little City That Couldn't".

    Then there's Dominick "Hands Off My Baby" Delucia's transparent and whiny press conference where he slammed Mayor Johnson while saying, "Let's be friends so we can save my ... 'our' ferry".  "Let's be partners", quips Delucia "and we can make this thing work".

    Translation: "I haven't got anywhere else to turn to and I guess a shared boat is better than no boat at all".  They're not called Corporate Whores for nothing, ya know.  Especially when the patron has the possibility of leaving a $40 million 'tip' on the nightstand.  "OOO Babee BAY-bee... Me love you whole lot".

    Q. What's the difference between a whore and a corporate executive?

    A. The whore knows who's getting screwed.

    Mohawk Prognosticating Segment.  EFIC slides in, snatches the keys to the ferry while muttering Sweet Nothings about the parentage of the local business and political glitterati and holds a Blue Light Special on a big boat in the Port of Rochester.  When?  Soon.  Well before the start of next spring's sailing season.

    Dismayed, but somewhat relieved to have a scapegoat to pin the blame on for the failed project, local luminaries seize the opportunity to show "We worked hard and tried everything we could to save the *community's*  ferry but those nasty EFIC folks are the reason the ferry is no more".  Shift the blame and try to engage career damage control.

    Nope.  Not gonna happen.  Not gonna LET it happen.   The reasons for the doomed project are to be found locally and the blame is to remain locally as well.  That's just the way it is.

    Not a pretty sight, but there you have it.

    November 24, 2004 0:48 AM
    CATS Founder : Olive Branch And Gauntlet 

    Jane Flasch (Rochester, NY) 11/23/04 - At a Tuesday evening press conference, CATS founder Dominic DeLucia condemned Rochester’s mayor for getting into a competition with CATS to try to purchase the ferry--and then issued a challenge.

    He said CATS does have a viable business plan.

    However, for the Australian lender, apparently that plan (or at least a viable version of it) has not come forward quickly enough.

    NewsSource 13 learned that the ferry’s lenders have filled out paperwork and were prepared to file a foreclosure notice December 1. With the help of the US Ambassador to Australia, the lenders agreed to back off that foreclosure date, but because of the pending foreclosure, the City of Rochester put forward its own plan, saying  it could no longer wait for CATS.

    Last week CATS accused the city of stealing its business plan for the ferry, and DeLucia said they would have had a deal if the city had not undercut them.

    DeLucia said, “If you were the Australian lender, you would do the exact same thing. Wouldn’t you like to accept $33 million today instead of being paid over time?”

    City Councilman Ben Douglas said, “I think they [CATS] don’t have the financial wherewithal to carry the business forward…the city’s plan offers at least the possibility of doing so.”

    DeLucia would not answer questions about a proposal CATS might have on the table, but he did say it’s time for the city and CATS to work together once again.

    Then he threw down the gauntlet…offering to be locked into a room 7:30 Monday morning with the mayor and anyone else necessary, and not come out until there was a completed deal.  (ed.  Delucia as the Drama Queen.)

    Paperwork filed Tuesday attempts to buy a little more time for everyone.

    Meanwhile back at the city, Mayor Bill Johnson wants council to approve $50,000 for a maritime lawyer to help the city fight CATS.  (ed.  Just can't help yourself, eh Bill?)

    City Council is expected to take up the matter at Tuesday night's meeting.

    See what I mean?  Fighting over who gets to invite the corpse over for dinner.  Between business 'leaders' hissing "It's mine... it's mine" and political 'leaders' trying to put lipstick on this pig, the local community winds up looking like the Apple Dumpling Gang.

    EFIC, will you PUH-leeze just get in here and Stop The Insanity.  These bimbos are clearly out of control and need a good lesson on why reality is the best policy.  From the start.

    Jan Wong, the Heroine of Lake Ontario, could have a field day writing about the Ferry Bad Idea Revisited.  I'll scour the Canadian take on all this tomorrow.  Right now, the situation is morphing from just plain ludicrous to full out surreal and I fear a rumble is in the making.

    Sort of like 'The Alien That Ate Our Community Leaders' Brains'.  Can't decide whether file this under Comedy, Tragedy, Drama, Science Fiction or Film Noir.  Whatever it is, I got this feeling it ain't good for business. To next page